Author: Jevgenia Tarassova

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Siemens AG and its Russian subsidiary held subsidiarily liable for debts of Russian Spin-Off in Landmark Judgment by Russian Court

The St. Petersburg Arbitrazh Court has held Siemens AG and its former Russian subsidiary subsidiarily liable for the debts of OOO (Russian LLC equivalent) “Neftegaz i Energetika”, marking a landmark insolvency judgment amid sanctions and contested restructuring. © unsplash, Sasun Bughdaryan I. Introduction On 21 August 2025, the Arbitrazh Court of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad […]

Arbitrators and Counsel face 7.5 bn fine by Russian Court in case of continuation of arbitration proceedings

On 9 September 2025, the Moscow Arbitration Court published its full decision on the application for an injunction prohibiting any continuation or maintenance of the arbitration proceedings in relation to Wintershall Dea. This will be examined in more detail below. I. Introduction On 9 September 2025, the Moscow Arbitrazh Court published its full decision on […]

Another case of “jurisdictional ping-pong” aka Russian Court Decision denies again recognition and enforcement of arbitral award

Mike Ackerman via Unsplash In another case of “jurisdictional ping-pong” (see other cases discussed by us here and here), the Arbitrazh Court of the Sverdlovsk Region rendered a judgment on 16 August 2024 (case no. A60-24839/2024) in a legal dispute between a Polish claimant and a Russian defendant regarding the recognition and enforcement of an […]

Arbitral award not recognised because arbitrators came from “unfriendly countries”

Darla Hueske via Unsplash Introduction On July 26. 2024, another judgment of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (Case А45-19015/2023, judgment No. 304-ЭС24-2799) made headlines regarding a legal dispute between a German claimant and Russian defendant. The underlying legal dispute was preceded by an arbitration award by an arbitration tribunal in London applying the FOSFA […]

Ping-Pong decisions on jurisdiction to arbitrate or not to arbitrate, that is the question

This article is the second part of the discussion of the judgement of the Higher Regional Court of Berlin no. 12 SchH 5/22 and aims to examine the phenomenon that courts in different jurisdictions (in this case, in Russia and in Germany) determine the competence to decide a dispute in exactly opposite ways: The Russian […]

Is it still possible to serve documents in Russia under the Hague Convention or can the German court go straight to public service?

Overview In a legal dispute between a German claimant and a Russian respondent, the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) dealt with the question of the admissibility of arbitration proceedings based on a dispute over the fulfilment of contractual obligations. In its landmark decision (dated 1 June 2023, case no 12 SchH 5/22), the Berlin Higher […]