The Wintershall Dea Saga is continuing and in its “third round” now. This time, the geographical scope is further expanded, and old problems are addressed with a renewed strategy. We have already covered the development that Russian courts have awarded claims of more than EUR 7.5bn against counsel, arbitrators and Wintershall Dea itself (read more […]
Category: EU Sanctions
Arbitrator biased: Paris CoA sets aside investment treaty award due to arbitrator’s firm’s published “no-Russia” policy and media likes
Cour d’appel de Paris, France, 15 January 2026, RG 22/19397
Introduction: On 15 January 2026, the Paris Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel de Paris, Pôle 5 – Chambre 16) issued a decision annulling a partial arbitral award rendered under the auspices of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA, Case No. 2019-34). The dispute involves the expropriation of Crimean real estate assets following Russia’s occupation of […]
Russian Court Recognizes Latvian Bankruptcy Ruling on Trademarks: A Remarkable Decision Amidst an Anti-Western Climate
IntroductionIn an environment characterized by increasing legal isolation and skepticism towards judgments from Western or so-called “unfriendly” countries, a recent ruling by the Moscow Arbitrazh Court (Case No. A40-300609/2024, published on 11 November 2025) stands out. The court confirmed the recognition of a Latvian court decision impacting high-value international trademarks, even as diplomatic relations between […]
Indirect Transactions Involving Frozen Assets under Regulation (EU) No 269/2014
Comment on General Court judgment in Case T-102/23 Introduction In a noteworthy judgment, the General Court (First Chamber) addressed the issue of indirect transactions involving frozen assets under Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (OJ 2022, L 193, p. 133). The case (T-102/23) provides important guidance on the scope of the prohibition on disposal and the concept […]
No enforcement against frozen property without prior
The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decided on January 25, 2024, under case number IX ZR 19/22, that without authorization from the German Federal Bank, frozen funds and economic resources cannot be seized under Regulation (EU) 2016/44. The case involved G. GmbH, which secured an arbitration award against the Libyan state fund L., entitling it […]