ICC award set aside: Serious Irregularity and Missed Issues Indus Powertech Inc v Echjay Industries Pvt Ltd [2026] EWHC 827 (Comm)

1. Introduction The decision in Indus Powertech Inc v Echjay Industries Private Limited [2026] EWHC 827 (Comm) addresses a challenge to an ICC arbitral award under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996. While reaffirming the high threshold and pro‑arbitration approach of the English courts, the judgment is an important illustration of how the English […]

Effects of ICC award nullified by contradicting Russian Lugovoy Law judgement

In its judgment of 27 April 2026, the Arbitrazh Court of the Murmansk Region (case no. A42-2551/2025) ordered T. AG (Germany) and AS L. (Latvia) to jointly compensate damages of EUR 8.8 million to ООО “MTP Lavna”. The court held that the defendants’ refusal to return advance payments—based on EU sanctions—constituted a tortious act under […]

Sanctions vs. Enforcement: Limits and Lessons from the Swiss Federal Tribunal

This decision provides essential guidance on the interaction between sanctions law and private enforcement mechanisms in Switzerland.For this, the Federal Tribunal establishes three key principles: This judgment is highly significant, as it forms part of a body of international case law recognizing the relevant claim in itself, although payment of that claim is not currently […]

Panama Papers Reveal True Owner: Court Orders Return of $25M Modigliani

On 3 April 2026, a New York court ordered the return of a $25 million Modigliani painting looted during the Nazi era, bringing to an end an 11-year legal battle between the heirs of a Jewish art dealer and the prominent Nahmad art dealing family. In Greason v. Nahmad (2026 NY Slip Op 50461), the […]

Digital Signatures on Arbitral Awards Suffice for Enforcement in Germany: New Ruling by the Bavarian Highest Regional Court

Image by Edar from Pixabay A. Introduction Can a foreign arbitral award signed exclusively by means of qualified electronic signatures be declared enforceable in Germany? The Bavarian Highest Regional Court (Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht, BayObLG) answered this question in the affirmative in a decision of 27 March 2026 (case no. 102 Sch 104/25 e).  The Court […]

An Email can interrupt limitation of CMR-claims, but if the carrier agrees to provide original CMRs, it has to provide originals: Recent Guidance from the Munich Court of Appeal

A. Background of the Case The Higher Regional Court (OLG) Munich (judgement of 15 January 2026, case no. 14 U 3118/25 e) recently dealt with a dispute over freight remuneration for four international road transports carried out in late September and early October 2023. The carrier (plaintiff) had invoiced a total of EUR 8,040 to […]

State Immunity is not absolute in Russian Courts says the Russian Supreme Court

On the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 24 March 2026, No. 78-КГ25-37-КЗ In two recent decisions, Russian courts dealt with claims against souvereign states. In the one case, (Supreme Court, case no. No. 78-КГ25-37-КЗ — provided below since the website of the Russian Supreme court is inaccessible from abroad), it […]

Mehr anzeigen (RU)