Category: Arbitration

BGH confirms: An application for confirmation of the scope of an arbitral clause can be filed even if proceedings on the merits are already pending in a state court: BGH, 6 November 2025, I ZB 33/25

Case Summary and Background The dispute decided by BGH on 6 November 2025 (case ref: I ZB 33/25) arose from a complex international supply relationship involving ship engines. In 2007, a German manufacturer sold four ship engines to an Australian company, I. Ltd., which installed them in the vessel “E.”. Over time, the ship changed […]

Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on the Setting Aside and Remittal of Arbitral Awards to the Original Tribunal for Re-Consideration

Introduction:In another rare decision on the setting-aside of an arbitral award, issued on 18 December 2025 (Case No. I ZB 42/25), the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) considered the appeal against the ruling by the Bavarian Supreme Regional Court (BayObLG, case no. 102 Sch 39/24 e), on which we had commented here. The […]

Rare decision: BayObLG Sets Aside Award due to Violation of Due Process and Inadequate Reasoning

BayObLG sets aside DIS award for violation of right to be heard

Introduction:In a recent decision delivered on 2 April 2025, the Bavarian Supreme Regional Court (BayObLG case no. 102 Sch 39/24) set aside an arbitral award in a high-profile dispute concerning milestone-based earn-outs in the life sciences sector. This ruling marks an important clarification on the requirements for due process (rechtliches Gehör) and the standard of […]

Sanctions-Related Arbitration Restrictions Challenged Before EU Courts

Introduction Two parallel actions for annulment have been filed before the European General Court, challenging specific provisions within the European Union’s sanctions framework targeting Russia. Cases T-655/25 and T-640/25 seek to invalidate newly introduced restrictions on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards related to EU sanctions measures. Image by Marc Schneider from Pixabay Legal […]

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Siemens AG and its Russian subsidiary held subsidiarily liable for debts of Russian Spin-Off in Landmark Judgment by Russian Court

The St. Petersburg Arbitrazh Court has held Siemens AG and its former Russian subsidiary subsidiarily liable for the debts of OOO (Russian LLC equivalent) “Neftegaz i Energetika”, marking a landmark insolvency judgment amid sanctions and contested restructuring. © unsplash, Sasun Bughdaryan I. Introduction On 21 August 2025, the Arbitrazh Court of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad […]

Is there a successful path for enforcement of an arbitral award in Russia?

In one of our recent articles (see here), we discussed a case in which the Russian commercial court refused to recognise an arbitral award because it was requested by a foreign company from a so-called unfriendly country without a domestic bank account. Enforcement would result in a violation of the provisional public order. Now, the […]

Arbitrators and Counsel face 7.5 bn fine by Russian Court in case of continuation of arbitration proceedings

On 9 September 2025, the Moscow Arbitration Court published its full decision on the application for an injunction prohibiting any continuation or maintenance of the arbitration proceedings in relation to Wintershall Dea. This will be examined in more detail below. I. Introduction On 9 September 2025, the Moscow Arbitrazh Court published its full decision on […]

Show more