News
Our Topics
-
Insurance law Maritime Industry
Nord Stream Pipeline Damage Excluded Under War Exclusion in Offshore Insurance Policies
Introduction In a decision dated 6 July 2026, the High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Commercial Court, in case number CL-2024-000094 ([2026] EWHC 1685 (Comm)) rendered a judgment on whether damage to the Nord Stream pipelines was excluded from insurance cover under war-related policy exclusions. The […]
-
Maritime Industry Sanctions
Under ExxonMobil VOY2005 sanctions clause, a real risk of sanction liability is sufficient to refuse loading of cargo
Summary In a recent decision published on 22 May 2026 “Tonzip Maritime (Singapore) Pte Ltd v 2 Rivers Pte Ltd” the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Civil Division [2026] EWCA Civ 641 – case no. CA-2025-002537, has allowed the appeal of the owners of the MV CATALAN SEA in a dispute arising from […]
-
Arbitration Maritime Industry
BGH confirms: An application for confirmation of the scope of an arbitral clause can be filed even if proceedings on the merits are already pending in a state court: BGH, 6 November 2025, I ZB 33/25
Case Summary and Background The dispute decided by BGH on 6 November 2025 (case ref: I ZB 33/25) arose from a complex international supply relationship involving ship engines. In 2007, a German manufacturer sold four ship engines to an Australian company, I. Ltd., which installed them in the vessel “E.”. Over time, the ship changed […]
-
Maritime Industry Recognition of foreign decisionsCyprus court decision not recognised in Russia
Since 1984, Cyprus was one of the few EU countries to have concluded a mutual legal assistance agreement with Russia in civil and criminal matters, under which the two countries undertook to recognise the decisions of each other’s courts (Art. 23). However, current practice is such that this provision is no longer applied. Decisions by […]
-
Arbitration Maritime IndustryThe ongoing legal saga: Court bans Finland’s Wartsila from suing a Russian plant abroad
A court in St. Petersburg has forbidden the Finnish company, Wartsila, from pursuing or continuing arbitration proceedings abroad against a Russian plant. This decision follows the court’s earlier rejection of Baltic Plant’s €7.6 million claim against Wartsila for non-compliance with six independent guarantees.
-
Maritime IndustryKDB.legal teamed up with Lexology – Getting the deal through and published the German chapter of the Shipping report
We are happy to share that KDB.legal teamed up with Lexology Getting The Deal Through and prepared the German chapter of the Shipping Report.
-
Maritime IndustryGerman insolvency law vs. worldwide freezing order 1:0
A worldwide freezing order under English law is a legal instrument that allows to freeze a defendant’s assets located across the world, and not limited to just one jurisdiction. In contrast to an arrest, a worldwide freezing order has no effect in rem, but ad personam. It may exert enforcement and good conduct pressure on internationally […]
