News

Our Topics


  • Lugovoy Law can be invoked against Russian Parties

    Cassation Court Orders Reconsideration of Jurisdiction In a decision dated 4 August 2026, the Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit in case number A40-27279/2026 rendered a judgment on the jurisdiction of Russian courts over a claim concerning Alfa Holding Issuance PLC eurobonds. The decision clarifies certain elements of art. 248.1 APK, known as “Lugovoy Law”. […]


  • Assignment of an ICC Award in Russia – the golden route to enforcement

    Sverdlovsk court rejects sanctions, sham-transaction and tribunal-composition objections in a dispute over an assigned supply receivable and allows the enforcement of an assigned claim.


  • When “Can Be Settled by Arbitration” Is Not Enough: Supreme Court of India on Optional Arbitration Clauses

    In a decision dated 17 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 19026 of 2023), Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd., 2026 INSC 384, rendered a judgment on whether the words “can be settled by arbitration” in a bill of lading created a binding […]


  • Singapore High Court Considers Concurrent Maritime Arbitrations and Third Party Participation

    In maritime (and all other transport related cases) there is often a chain of contracts (like headcharter-timecharter-subcharter etc.) And when damage is caused, the party who suffered the loss likely has no direct claim against the party that caused it and a chain of disputes is started. So there is a need to align the […]


  • Singapore Court Sets Aside a SIAC Award Which a Russian Court Had Already Recognised

    Introduction In a decision dated 8 July 2026, the Arbitrazh Court of Moscow in case number A40-20468/24-19-154 rendered a judgment on the reopening of Russian recognition and enforcement proceedings following the partial setting aside of a SIAC award by the Singapore Court of Appeal in Vietnam Oil and Gas Group v Joint Stock Company (Power […]


  • AIFC Court sets aside Naftogaz recognition order against Gazprom for lack of jurisdiction

    Introduction In a decision dated 7 July 2026, the Court of First Instance of the Astana International Financial Centre in case number AIFC-C/CFI/2026/0002, National Joint Stock Company “Naftogaz of Ukraine” JSC v Gazprom PJSC, rendered a judgment on the AIFC Court’s jurisdiction to recognise and enforce a foreign-seated ICC arbitral award. Justice Lord Faulks KC […]


  • Russian Court Upholds London Arbitration Clause in Bareboat Charter Dispute

    Arbitrazh Court of the Nizhny Novgorod RegionDecision dated: 28 June 2026 (operative part announced on 7 May 2026)Case No.: A43-34213/2023 Overview In a very recent decision, the Arbitrazh Court of the Nizhny Novgorod Region left without consideration a claim for RUB 409,582,668 brought by AAS Amur Assets Shipping Company Limited (Cyprus) against LLC “Nizhny Novgorod […]



Contact

Let‘s get in touch

KDB.legal Koch Boës
Attorneys at law

Großer Burstah 25
D – 20457 Hamburg

Tel +49 40 307 090 70
Fax +49 40 307 090 717